The cable pundits had Donald Trump’s movement in a casket before the last midterm ballots were even counted.
Liberal commentators swear voters finally buried the whole thing for good.
And Laura Ingraham just pointed to one forgotten chapter of history that wrecks their funeral.
The Left Booked the Hearse Before the Polls Closed
Democrats grabbed control of the House and the Senate in the midterm elections, flipping Republican Senate seats in places that hadn’t sent a Democrat to Washington in decades.
The victory lap started right on schedule. CNN commentator and former Obama adviser Van Jones called the blue wave “the repudiation of Trumpism that people have been hoping for.”
Ingraham wasn’t buying the eulogy.
In a Fox News opinion column posted the morning after the vote, the host of The Ingraham Angle rattled off the obituaries she saw coming from op-ed pages and podcasts: “This is the end of Trumpism!” “Conservative Populism, RIP.” “Goodbye, MAGA!”
Then she reminded readers how many times the same crowd had already dug that grave. They called it after the first impeachment. They called it after the 2020 election, after January 6, after the second impeachment, and after every indictment prosecutors filed against Trump.
“Their wishful thinking is as dim-witted now as it was then,” Ingraham wrote.
She has a point, and the history backs her up. On the night of January 6, 2021, the late Lindsey Graham stood on the Senate floor and declared, “Count me out. Enough is enough.” By May 2021, Graham had changed his tune entirely. “Can we move forward without President Trump? The answer is no,” he said.
Four months. That’s about how long a Washington obituary for this movement tends to last.
Ingraham Wants Trump Graded on the Report Card, Not One Rough Night
Ingraham’s real argument skips the vote count altogether. She wants the movement judged by what it delivered, and she brought receipts.
On the economy, she pointed to Census-style income figures showing real median household income climbing from $77,230 in 2016 to a record $87,460 in 2025, with both numbers adjusted for inflation. Citing The Washington Post, she noted the federal workforce shed 255,000 employees between December 2024 and June 2026.
Core inflation, which hit 6.6% in September 2022 under Joe Biden, sat at 2.6% this September by her count. She also cited OECD projections putting American growth at the top of the G7 for 2026, plus a third-quarter growth rate of 3.4%.
But the economy only made up part of her case.
On the border, she credited Trump with finally keeping a promise Republican Presidents dangled for decades. On the Supreme Court, she noted Roe v Wade is gone, a goal social conservatives chased for forty years before Trump appointed the justices who got it done. On Communist China, she wrote that the American economic lead over Beijing widened from $7.3 trillion in 2016 to $11.3 trillion last year.
And she didn’t pretend everything was rosy. “Of course, voters, including this one, are frustrated with the Iran conflict, and they want lower gas prices,” Ingraham admitted.
That’s an honest line, and it cuts in a direction the gloating pundits won’t like. Voters didn’t fire the border, the tax cuts, or the end of Roe. Gas prices and a conflict halfway around the world soured the mood, and Trump has worked to end that fight through diplomacy rather than an invasion. Ingraham, citing The Wall Street Journal, noted Persian Gulf oil exports now top prewar levels anyway.
As for what the winners offered instead, Ingraham summed it up bluntly: “It is a campaign of retribution, not prosperity.”
Anybody who watched House Democrats line up subpoenas on election night knows she isn’t exaggerating.
The Reagan Chapter Democrats Would Rather Skip
Tucked near the end of her column sat one question that deserves a lot more attention than she gave it.
“Can you imagine Republicans abandoning Reagan because he lost eight Senate seats in 1986?” Ingraham asked.
Most folks under 50 probably don’t remember that Ronald Reagan got clobbered in his second midterm. Democrats took back the Senate. Pain in farm country, oil patch towns, steel mills, and timber communities drove much of that loss, according to The Christian Science Monitor’s look back the following year.
Sound familiar? Swap farm prices for diesel prices and the 1986 map starts to rhyme with this one.
But here’s what the pundits of 1986 missed. Reagan’s biggest moments came after the Democrats took the gavels.
In June 1987, Reagan stood at the Brandenburg Gate in West Berlin and said, “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!” In December 1987, he signed the INF Treaty with Mikhail Gorbachev at the White House, wiping out an entire class of nuclear missiles. And in May 1988, the very Senate Democrats had just won from him ratified that treaty by a vote of 93 to 5, while Reagan prepared to land in Moscow.
Now, one could argue Reagan simply got lucky with a reformer on the other side of the table. Maybe. But luck doesn’t explain why a Democrat Senate felt it had no choice but to sign off. Reagan built the leverage first, with the defense buildup his critics hated, and the treaty followed.
That’s the template Ingraham is hinting at, even if she only gave it one sentence.
Two Years Is a Long Time With a Veto Pen
Trump still holds the White House until January 2029. Foreign policy still runs through the Oval Office, and that includes the Iran talks, trade enforcement against Communist China, and the border.
Democrats can hold hearings. They can send bills to the Resolute Desk. But without two-thirds of both chambers, they can’t override a veto, and they don’t have anything close to that.
And the Left’s track record of interpreting a midterm win is not great. They read 2018 as a mandate for impeachment, then watched Trump’s approval among Republicans hold firm through two trials.
Ingraham closed by urging conservatives not to lose their nerve over one night. She also invoked Reagan’s warning that “Freedom is never more than one generation from extinction.”
The pundits measuring the casket might want to check the history books before the funeral.
The Senate that Ronald Reagan lost in November 1986 ratified his nuclear treaty with the Soviet Union 93 to 5 in May 1988.
Sources: Fox News, “LAURA INGRAHAM: Richer, safer and stronger: Why the Trump agenda deserves to keep going”; Variety, “Democrats Win House and Senate in Sweeping Rout of GOP”; NBC News midterm live coverage; Forbes midterm live updates; CBS/WBTV and The Washington Times on Lindsey Graham’s January 6, 2021 remarks; Ynetnews on Graham’s May 2021 remarks; Voteview, Senate Vote 586 (May 27, 1988); FAS INF Treaty chronology; Reagan Presidential Library; The Christian Science Monitor, “Recession, not arms control, as the key to 1988.”
Stay connected